6360 Aluminum vs. EN 1.4903 Stainless Steel
6360 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while EN 1.4903 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 6360 aluminum and the bottom bar is EN 1.4903 stainless steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 68 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 9.0 to 18 | |
| 20 to 21 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 31 to 67 | |
| 320 to 330 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.28 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 26 | |
| 75 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 76 to 130 | |
| 420 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 120 to 220 | |
| 670 to 680 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 57 to 170 | |
| 500 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 400 | |
| 270 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 160 | |
| 650 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 640 | |
| 1460 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 630 | |
| 1420 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 900 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 210 | |
| 26 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 23 | |
| 11 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 54 | |
| 3.4 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 180 | |
| 4.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | |
| 7.0 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.7 | |
| 7.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.3 | |
| 2.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 36 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1190 | |
| 88 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 14 to 19 | |
| 120 to 130 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 24 to 210 | |
| 650 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 50 | |
| 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 13 to 23 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 to 30 | |
| 22 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 86 | |
| 7.0 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 5.5 to 9.9 | |
| 23 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 97.8 to 99.3 | |
| 0 to 0.040 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0.080 to 0.12 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 8.0 to 9.5 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0.1 to 0.3 | |
| 87.1 to 90.5 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.25 to 0.45 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.020 to 0.15 | |
| 0.3 to 0.6 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 0.85 to 1.1 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 0 | |
| 0.060 to 0.1 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0.030 to 0.070 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.025 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.35 to 0.8 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 0.18 to 0.25 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |