7003 Aluminum vs. EN 1.0225 Steel
7003 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while EN 1.0225 steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (1, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 7003 aluminum and the bottom bar is EN 1.0225 steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 70 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
| 6.7 to 24 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 130 to 150 | |
| 170 to 220 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 26 | |
| 73 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 210 to 230 | |
| 280 to 290 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 350 to 390 | |
| 440 to 500 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 300 to 310 | |
| 230 to 380 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 380 | |
| 250 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 200 | |
| 400 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 630 | |
| 1460 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 510 | |
| 1420 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 870 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 150 | |
| 52 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 24 | |
| 12 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 36 | |
| 7.1 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 110 | |
| 8.1 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | |
| 1.8 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.9 | |
| 7.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.1 | |
| 1.4 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 18 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1140 | |
| 46 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 37 to 41 | |
| 31 to 95 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 630 to 710 | |
| 140 to 390 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 47 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 33 to 37 | |
| 16 to 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 37 to 40 | |
| 16 to 18 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 59 | |
| 14 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 15 to 17 | |
| 14 to 16 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 90.6 to 94.5 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.21 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 98 to 100 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.5 to 1.0 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 0 to 1.4 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.045 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.045 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 5.0 to 6.5 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0.050 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |