AISI 302 Stainless Steel vs. 242.0 Aluminum
AISI 302 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while 242.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 32 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AISI 302 stainless steel and the bottom bar is 242.0 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 170 to 440 | |
| 70 to 110 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 200 | |
| 73 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 4.5 to 46 | |
| 0.5 to 1.5 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 210 to 520 | |
| 55 to 110 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 77 | |
| 27 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 400 to 830 | |
| 150 to 240 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 580 to 1430 | |
| 180 to 290 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 230 to 1100 | |
| 120 to 220 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 280 | |
| 390 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 710 | |
| 210 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 640 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1400 | |
| 530 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 480 | |
| 870 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 16 | |
| 130 to 170 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 22 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.4 | |
| 33 to 44 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.8 | |
| 96 to 130 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 15 | |
| 12 |
| Calomel Potential, mV | -70 | |
| -650 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.8 | |
| 3.1 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 3.0 | |
| 8.3 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 42 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 140 | |
| 1130 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 59 to 260 | |
| 1.3 to 3.4 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 140 to 3070 | |
| 110 to 340 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 45 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 21 to 51 | |
| 16 to 26 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 to 36 | |
| 23 to 32 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 4.4 | |
| 50 to 62 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 12 to 31 | |
| 8.0 to 13 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 88.4 to 93.6 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 17 to 19 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 3.5 to 4.5 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 67.9 to 75 | |
| 0 to 1.0 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 1.2 to 1.8 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 2.0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 8.0 to 10 | |
| 1.7 to 2.3 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.045 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.75 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |