ASTM A202 Steel vs. Grade 33 Titanium
ASTM A202 steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while grade 33 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ASTM A202 steel and the bottom bar is grade 33 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
110 |
Elongation at Break, % | 17 to 18 | |
23 |
Fatigue Strength, MPa | 240 | |
250 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
0.32 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 73 | |
41 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 360 to 410 | |
240 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 590 to 670 | |
390 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 350 to 360 | |
350 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 260 | |
420 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 410 | |
320 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1450 | |
1660 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1410 | |
1610 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
540 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 52 | |
21 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
8.7 |
Electrical Properties
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 7.3 | |
3.4 |
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 8.4 | |
6.9 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Base Metal Price, % relative | 2.1 | |
55 |
Density, g/cm3 | 7.8 | |
4.5 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.4 | |
33 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 19 | |
530 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 49 | |
200 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 93 to 96 | |
86 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 330 to 350 | |
590 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
13 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
35 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 21 to 24 | |
24 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 to 22 | |
26 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 14 | |
8.7 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 17 to 20 | |
30 |