ASTM A387 Grade 22 Steel vs. AZ91D Magnesium
ASTM A387 grade 22 steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while AZ91D magnesium belongs to the magnesium alloys. There are 31 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ASTM A387 grade 22 steel and the bottom bar is AZ91D magnesium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 150 to 180 | |
| 60 to 80 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 46 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 21 | |
| 2.3 to 4.5 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 160 to 240 | |
| 74 to 85 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 74 | |
| 18 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 300 to 380 | |
| 120 to 140 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 480 to 600 | |
| 160 to 220 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 230 to 350 | |
| 80 to 130 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 260 | |
| 350 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 460 | |
| 130 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1470 | |
| 600 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1430 | |
| 490 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
| 990 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 40 | |
| 78 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
| 27 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 7.5 | |
| 11 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 8.6 | |
| 58 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 3.8 | |
| 12 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.9 | |
| 1.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.7 | |
| 22 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 23 | |
| 160 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 58 | |
| 990 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 85 to 110 | |
| 4.2 to 7.7 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 140 to 320 | |
| 69 to 170 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 15 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 69 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 17 to 21 | |
| 26 to 34 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 17 to 20 | |
| 38 to 46 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 11 | |
| 45 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 17 | |
| 9.5 to 13 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 8.3 to 9.7 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.050 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 2.0 to 2.5 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 95.1 to 96.8 | |
| 0 to 0.0050 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 88.7 to 91.2 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.3 to 0.6 | |
| 0.15 to 0.5 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0.9 to 1.1 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0020 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0.35 to 1.0 |