ASTM Grade HL Steel vs. AWS E310H
Both ASTM grade HL steel and AWS E310H are iron alloys. They have a very high 96% of their average alloy composition in common. There are 21 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (11, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ASTM grade HL steel and the bottom bar is AWS E310H.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 200 | |
| 200 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
| 11 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.27 | |
| 0.27 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 80 | |
| 79 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 500 | |
| 690 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 320 | |
| 300 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1390 | |
| 1400 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1340 | |
| 1350 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 490 | |
| 480 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 14 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 27 | |
| 26 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.8 | |
| 7.9 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.5 | |
| 4.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 65 | |
| 65 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 210 | |
| 200 |
Common Calculations
| PREN (Pitting Resistance) | 31 | |
| 28 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 18 | |
| 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 18 | |
| 22 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 11 | |
| 17 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0.2 to 0.6 | |
| 0.35 to 0.45 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 28 to 32 | |
| 25 to 28 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.75 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 40.8 to 53.8 | |
| 44.2 to 53.7 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 2.0 | |
| 1.0 to 2.5 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 to 0.75 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 18 to 22 | |
| 20 to 22.5 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.040 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 2.0 | |
| 0 to 0.75 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.040 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |