Class 1 Tungsten vs. Grade 2 Babbitt Metal
Both class 1 tungsten and grade 2 Babbitt Metal are otherwise unclassified metals. Both are furnished in the as-fabricated (no temper or treatment) condition. There are 14 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (16, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is class 1 tungsten and the bottom bar is grade 2 Babbitt Metal.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 250 | |
| 53 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.35 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 98 | |
| 19 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 580 | |
| 42 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 160 | |
| 72 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 120 | |
| 230 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 5.1 | |
| 21 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 15 | |
| 7.3 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 22 | |
| 12 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 340 | |
| 200 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 140 | |
| 1240 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 660 | |
| 17 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.6 | |
| 4.0 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 14 | |
| 17 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0050 |
| Antimony (Sb), % | 0 | |
| 7.0 to 8.0 |
| Arsenic (As), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Bismuth (Bi), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 3.0 to 4.0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 87.3 to 90 |
| Tungsten (W), % | 90 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0050 |
| Residuals, % | 10 | |
| 0 |