Commercially Pure Zirconium vs. C79200 Nickel Silver
Commercially pure zirconium belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals classification, while C79200 nickel silver belongs to the copper alloys. There are 16 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (13, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is commercially pure zirconium and the bottom bar is C79200 nickel silver.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 98 | |
| 120 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 36 | |
| 44 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 430 | |
| 480 to 540 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 190 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
| 390 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 22 | |
| 42 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 5.5 | |
| 19 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.7 | |
| 8.4 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 450 | |
| 310 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.1 | |
| 7.7 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 19 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 18 | |
| 16 to 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 | |
| 16 to 18 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
| 13 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 56 | |
| 16 to 18 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 59 to 66.5 |
| Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 to 4.5 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0.8 to 1.4 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 11 to 13 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.16 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 17.9 to 29.2 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 94.7 to 100 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |