CC140C Copper vs. Grade CW6M Nickel
CC140C copper belongs to the copper alloys classification, while grade CW6M nickel belongs to the nickel alloys. There are 24 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (6, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is CC140C copper and the bottom bar is grade CW6M nickel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 120 | |
220 |
Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
29 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
0.29 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 44 | |
84 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 340 | |
560 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 230 | |
310 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 210 | |
330 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 200 | |
970 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1100 | |
1530 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1040 | |
1470 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 390 | |
430 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
12 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Base Metal Price, % relative | 31 | |
65 |
Density, g/cm3 | 8.9 | |
8.8 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 2.6 | |
13 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 41 | |
170 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 310 | |
300 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 34 | |
140 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 220 | |
220 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.3 | |
14 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 18 | |
23 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 10 | |
18 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 12 | |
17 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 12 | |
16 |
Alloy Composition
Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.070 |
Chromium (Cr), % | 0.4 to 1.2 | |
17 to 20 |
Copper (Cu), % | 98.8 to 99.6 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 | |
0 to 3.0 |
Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
0 to 1.0 |
Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
17 to 20 |
Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
54.9 to 66 |
Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.040 |
Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
0 to 1.0 |
Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.030 |