Engineering Porcelain vs. Titanium Diboride
Engineering porcelain belongs to the oxide-based engineering ceramics classification, while titanium diboride belongs to the non-oxide engineering ceramics. There are 20 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (7, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is engineering porcelain and the bottom bar is titanium diboride.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Compressive (Crushing) Strength, MPa | 590 | |
| 3540 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 67 to 150 | |
| 290 |
| Flexural Strength, MPa | 43 to 160 | |
| 380 |
| Fracture Toughness, MPa-m1/2 | 2.0 | |
| 6.5 |
| Knoop Hardness | 600 | |
| 2800 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.17 | |
| 0.11 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 130 | |
| 280 |
Thermal Properties
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 1170 | |
| 1270 |
| Maximum Thermal Shock, °C | 170 to 290 | |
| 110 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 600 to 1000 | |
| 870 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 1.8 to 6.5 | |
| 58 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 2.0 to 6.6 | |
| 8.0 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Resistivity Order of Magnitude, 10x Ω-m | 9.0 to 12 | |
| -6.5 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.3 to 3.0 | |
| 4.5 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 16 to 29 | |
| 35 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 49 to 65 | |
| 49 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 12 to 16 | |
| 17 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 to 25 | |
| 21 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 0.73 to 3.9 | |
| 15 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 11 to 53 | |
| 8.7 |