Grade 16 Titanium vs. 515.0 Aluminum
Grade 16 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while 515.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 22 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (9, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 16 titanium and the bottom bar is 515.0 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
70 |
Elongation at Break, % | 23 | |
10 |
Fatigue Strength, MPa | 240 | |
130 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
0.33 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 38 | |
26 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 250 | |
190 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 400 | |
280 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 420 | |
470 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
170 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1660 | |
620 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1610 | |
620 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 540 | |
900 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 9.2 | |
23 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 4.5 | |
2.6 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 36 | |
8.4 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 600 | |
150 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 230 | |
1120 |
Common Calculations
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
15 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
52 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 25 | |
30 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 27 | |
36 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 29 | |
13 |
Alloy Composition
Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
93.6 to 96.6 |
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
0 |
Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.2 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
0 to 1.3 |
Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
2.5 to 4.0 |
Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
0.4 to 0.6 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
0 |
Palladium (Pd), % | 0.040 to 0.080 | |
0 |
Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
0.5 to 10 |
Titanium (Ti), % | 98.8 to 99.96 | |
0 |
Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.1 |
Residuals, % | 0 | |
0 to 0.15 |