Grade 19 Titanium vs. ASTM A285 Carbon Steel
Grade 19 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while ASTM A285 carbon steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 28 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 19 titanium and the bottom bar is ASTM A285 carbon steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 120 | |
190 |
Elongation at Break, % | 5.6 to 17 | |
30 to 34 |
Fatigue Strength, MPa | 550 to 620 | |
150 to 180 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
0.29 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 47 | |
73 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 550 to 750 | |
250 to 290 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 890 to 1300 | |
380 to 450 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 870 to 1170 | |
190 to 230 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 400 | |
250 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 370 | |
400 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1660 | |
1470 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1600 | |
1420 to 1430 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 520 | |
470 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 6.2 | |
53 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 9.1 | |
12 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Base Metal Price, % relative | 45 | |
1.8 |
Density, g/cm3 | 5.0 | |
7.9 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 47 | |
1.4 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 760 | |
18 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 230 | |
46 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 70 to 150 | |
110 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 3040 to 5530 | |
94 to 150 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
13 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 33 | |
24 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 49 to 72 | |
13 to 16 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 41 to 53 | |
15 to 17 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 2.4 | |
14 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 57 to 83 | |
12 to 14 |