Grade 33 Titanium vs. ASTM A202 Steel
Grade 33 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while ASTM A202 steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 33 titanium and the bottom bar is ASTM A202 steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
190 |
Elongation at Break, % | 23 | |
17 to 18 |
Fatigue Strength, MPa | 250 | |
240 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
0.29 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 41 | |
73 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 240 | |
360 to 410 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 390 | |
590 to 670 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 350 | |
350 to 360 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 420 | |
260 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
410 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1660 | |
1450 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1610 | |
1410 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 540 | |
470 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 21 | |
52 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.7 | |
13 |
Electrical Properties
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 3.4 | |
7.3 |
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 6.9 | |
8.4 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Base Metal Price, % relative | 55 | |
2.1 |
Density, g/cm3 | 4.5 | |
7.8 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 33 | |
1.4 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 530 | |
19 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 200 | |
49 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 86 | |
93 to 96 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 590 | |
330 to 350 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
13 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
24 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 24 | |
21 to 24 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 26 | |
20 to 22 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 8.7 | |
14 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 30 | |
17 to 20 |