Grade 350 Maraging Steel vs. 6065 Aluminum
Grade 350 maraging steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while 6065 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 23 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (10, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 350 maraging steel and the bottom bar is 6065 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 68 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 4.1 to 18 | |
| 4.5 to 11 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.3 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 75 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 710 to 1400 | |
| 190 to 230 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 1140 to 2420 | |
| 310 to 400 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 830 to 2300 | |
| 270 to 380 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 270 | |
| 400 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1470 | |
| 640 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 590 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 450 | |
| 890 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 12 | |
| 23 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 39 | |
| 11 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.2 | |
| 2.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 5.6 | |
| 8.4 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 74 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 160 | |
| 1200 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 98 to 190 | |
| 17 to 34 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 49 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 38 to 82 | |
| 31 to 40 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 29 to 49 | |
| 36 to 43 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 35 to 74 | |
| 14 to 18 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0.050 to 0.15 | |
| 94.4 to 98.2 |
| Bismuth (Bi), % | 0 | |
| 0.5 to 1.5 |
| Boron (B), % | 0 to 0.0030 | |
| 0 |
| Calcium (Ca), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Cobalt (Co), % | 11.5 to 12.5 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0.15 to 0.4 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 61.2 to 64.6 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.8 to 1.2 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 4.6 to 5.2 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 18 to 19 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0.4 to 0.8 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 1.3 to 1.6 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |