Grade 36 Titanium vs. ASTM A210 Steel
Grade 36 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while ASTM A210 steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 25 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (6, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 36 titanium and the bottom bar is ASTM A210 steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
| 34 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 300 | |
| 230 to 250 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.36 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 39 | |
| 73 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 320 | |
| 320 to 360 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 530 | |
| 470 to 540 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 520 | |
| 290 to 310 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
| 250 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
| 400 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 2020 | |
| 1460 to 1470 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1950 | |
| 1420 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 420 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.1 | |
| 12 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.3 | |
| 7.9 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 58 | |
| 1.4 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 920 | |
| 18 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 130 | |
| 45 to 46 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 59 | |
| 140 to 160 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 1260 | |
| 230 to 250 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.3 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 | |
| 17 to 19 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 17 to 19 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 45 | |
| 15 to 17 |