Grade 36 Titanium vs. C11000 Copper
Grade 36 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while C11000 copper belongs to the copper alloys. There are 24 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (8, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 36 titanium and the bottom bar is C11000 copper.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
120 |
Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
1.5 to 50 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.36 | |
0.34 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 39 | |
43 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 320 | |
150 to 230 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 530 | |
220 to 410 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 520 | |
69 to 390 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
210 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
200 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 2020 | |
1080 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1950 | |
1070 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 420 | |
390 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.1 | |
17 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 6.3 | |
9.0 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 58 | |
2.6 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 920 | |
41 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 130 | |
310 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 59 | |
6.1 to 91 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 1260 | |
21 to 640 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.3 | |
7.2 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
18 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 | |
6.8 to 13 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
9.0 to 14 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 45 | |
8.0 to 15 |
Alloy Composition
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
99.9 to 100 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0035 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Niobium (Nb), % | 42 to 47 | |
0 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.16 | |
0 |
Titanium (Ti), % | 52.3 to 58 | |
0 |
Residuals, % | 0 | |
0 to 0.1 |