Grade 36 Titanium vs. C19020 Copper
Grade 36 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while C19020 copper belongs to the copper alloys. There are 21 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (9, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 36 titanium and the bottom bar is C19020 copper.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
120 |
Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
2.3 to 5.7 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.36 | |
0.34 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 39 | |
44 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 320 | |
260 to 340 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 530 | |
440 to 590 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
210 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
200 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 2020 | |
1090 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1950 | |
1030 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 420 | |
390 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.1 | |
17 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 6.3 | |
8.9 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 58 | |
2.8 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 920 | |
44 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 130 | |
310 |
Common Calculations
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.3 | |
7.2 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
18 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 | |
14 to 18 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
14 to 18 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 45 | |
16 to 21 |
Alloy Composition
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
95.7 to 99.19 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0035 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
0.5 to 3.0 |
Niobium (Nb), % | 42 to 47 | |
0 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.16 | |
0 |
Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
0.010 to 0.2 |
Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
0.3 to 0.9 |
Titanium (Ti), % | 52.3 to 58 | |
0 |
Residuals, % | 0 | |
0 to 0.2 |