Grade 36 Titanium vs. C52100 Bronze
Grade 36 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while C52100 bronze belongs to the copper alloys. There are 19 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (13, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 36 titanium and the bottom bar is C52100 bronze.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 110 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.36 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 39 | |
| 41 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 530 | |
| 380 to 800 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
| 200 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
| 180 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 2020 | |
| 1030 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1950 | |
| 880 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 420 | |
| 370 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.1 | |
| 18 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.3 | |
| 8.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 58 | |
| 3.4 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 920 | |
| 55 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 130 | |
| 370 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.3 | |
| 7.0 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 | |
| 12 to 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 13 to 22 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 45 | |
| 14 to 28 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 89.8 to 93 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0035 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 42 to 47 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.16 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0.030 to 0.35 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 7.0 to 9.0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 52.3 to 58 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |