Grade 36 Titanium vs. C95300 Bronze
Grade 36 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while C95300 bronze belongs to the copper alloys. There are 23 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (8, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 36 titanium and the bottom bar is C95300 bronze.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
110 |
Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
14 to 25 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.36 | |
0.34 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 39 | |
42 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 530 | |
520 to 610 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 520 | |
190 to 310 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
230 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
220 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 2020 | |
1050 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1950 | |
1040 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 420 | |
440 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.1 | |
18 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 6.3 | |
8.3 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 58 | |
3.1 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 920 | |
52 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 130 | |
390 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 59 | |
73 to 100 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 1260 | |
170 to 420 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.3 | |
7.5 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
19 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 | |
17 to 21 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
17 to 19 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 45 | |
19 to 22 |
Alloy Composition
Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
9.0 to 11 |
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
86.5 to 90.2 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0035 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0.8 to 1.5 |
Niobium (Nb), % | 42 to 47 | |
0 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.16 | |
0 |
Titanium (Ti), % | 52.3 to 58 | |
0 |
Residuals, % | 0 | |
0 to 1.0 |