Grade 360 Molybdenum vs. C10200 Copper
Grade 360 molybdenum belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals classification, while C10200 copper belongs to the copper alloys. There are 20 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (11, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 360 molybdenum and the bottom bar is C10200 copper.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 310 | |
| 120 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 6.3 to 17 | |
| 2.6 to 50 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.31 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 120 | |
| 43 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 430 to 620 | |
| 230 to 410 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 to 530 | |
| 77 to 400 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
| 210 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 250 | |
| 390 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 7.0 | |
| 17 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 10 | |
| 9.0 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 28 | |
| 2.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 330 | |
| 41 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 360 | |
| 310 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 37 to 64 | |
| 9.4 to 91 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 120 to 450 | |
| 25 to 690 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 17 | |
| 7.2 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 22 | |
| 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 12 to 17 | |
| 7.2 to 13 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 12 to 16 | |
| 9.4 to 14 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 21 | |
| 8.2 to 15 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 99.95 to 100 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 99.9 to 100 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.0020 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.0020 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.0015 | |
| 0 to 0.0010 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |