Grade 704C Zirconium vs. R60901 Alloy
Both grade 704C zirconium and R60901 alloy are otherwise unclassified metals. They have a very high 96% of their average alloy composition in common. There are 20 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 704C zirconium and the bottom bar is R60901 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 97 | |
98 |
Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
17 to 22 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
0.34 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 36 | |
37 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 470 | |
500 to 580 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 310 | |
350 to 390 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 240 | |
250 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
270 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 21 | |
17 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 5.9 | |
6.3 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 6.7 | |
6.6 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 460 | |
270 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 48 | |
88 to 100 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 490 | |
640 to 760 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.1 | |
8.3 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
23 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 20 | |
21 to 25 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 | |
21 to 24 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
9.7 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 58 | |
58 to 67 |
Alloy Composition
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
0 |
Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 to 4.5 | |
0 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
0 |
Niobium (Nb), % | 0 | |
2.4 to 2.8 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
0 |
Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
0 |
Tin (Sn), % | 1.0 to 2.0 | |
0 |
Zirconium (Zr), % | 92.9 to 99 | |
96.8 to 97.5 |
Residuals, % | 0 | |
0 to 0.29 |