Grade 8 Babbitt Metal vs. Grade 704C Zirconium
Both grade 8 Babbitt Metal and grade 704C zirconium are otherwise unclassified metals. Both are furnished in the as-fabricated (no temper or treatment) condition. There are 15 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (13, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 8 Babbitt Metal and the bottom bar is grade 704C zirconium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 15 | |
| 210 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 24 | |
| 97 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.41 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 8.5 | |
| 36 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 23 | |
| 310 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 46 | |
| 240 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 150 | |
| 270 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 24 | |
| 21 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 24 | |
| 5.9 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 10 | |
| 6.7 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 840 | |
| 460 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 11 | |
| 490 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 1.3 | |
| 8.1 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 9.2 | |
| 23 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 16 | |
| 12 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0 |
| Antimony (Sb), % | 14 to 16 | |
| 0 |
| Arsenic (As), % | 0.3 to 0.6 | |
| 0 |
| Bismuth (Bi), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 4.5 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0050 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 77.1 to 81.2 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.010 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 4.5 to 5.5 | |
| 1.0 to 2.0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 92.9 to 99 |