Grade Ti-Pd7B Titanium vs. R60802 Alloy
Grade Ti-Pd7B titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while R60802 alloy belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals. There are 20 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (10, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade Ti-Pd7B titanium and the bottom bar is R60802 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 98 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 17 | |
| 22 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 40 | |
| 36 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 390 | |
| 430 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 310 | |
| 270 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 420 | |
| 250 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 540 | |
| 270 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 22 | |
| 22 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.7 | |
| 6.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 4.5 | |
| 6.5 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 520 | |
| 290 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 62 | |
| 85 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 440 | |
| 380 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 8.3 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
| 23 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 24 | |
| 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 26 | |
| 19 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 8.9 | |
| 12 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 30 | |
| 53 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0.050 to 0.15 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0.070 to 0.2 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0.030 to 0.080 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 |
| Palladium (Pd), % | 0.12 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 1.2 to 1.7 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 98.8 to 99.9 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 97.8 to 98.7 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.11 |