ISO-WD32250 Magnesium vs. C55284 Copper
ISO-WD32250 magnesium belongs to the magnesium alloys classification, while C55284 copper belongs to the copper alloys. There are 18 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (13, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ISO-WD32250 magnesium and the bottom bar is C55284 copper.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 45 | |
| 100 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 17 | |
| 38 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 310 to 330 | |
| 180 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 340 | |
| 180 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 120 | |
| 200 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 600 | |
| 800 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 550 | |
| 640 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 980 | |
| 380 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 26 | |
| 17 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 1.8 | |
| 8.9 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 24 | |
| 16 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 160 | |
| 260 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 6.5 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 67 | |
| 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 49 to 51 | |
| 5.6 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 58 to 60 | |
| 8.0 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 19 to 20 | |
| 7.4 |
Alloy Composition
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 79.2 to 80.7 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 94.9 to 97.1 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 4.8 to 5.2 |
| Silver (Ag), % | 0 | |
| 14.5 to 15.5 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 2.5 to 4.0 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0.45 to 0.8 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |