SAE-AISI 1025 Steel vs. EN AC-46500 Aluminum
SAE-AISI 1025 steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while EN AC-46500 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is SAE-AISI 1025 steel and the bottom bar is EN AC-46500 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 130 to 140 | |
| 91 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 74 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 17 to 28 | |
| 1.0 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 190 to 280 | |
| 110 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 73 | |
| 28 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 450 to 500 | |
| 270 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 250 to 420 | |
| 160 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 520 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 400 | |
| 180 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1460 | |
| 610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 520 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
| 880 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 52 | |
| 100 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 12 | |
| 21 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 6.9 | |
| 26 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 8.0 | |
| 81 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 1.8 | |
| 10 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.9 | |
| 2.9 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.4 | |
| 7.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 18 | |
| 140 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 45 | |
| 1030 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 80 to 110 | |
| 2.3 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 170 to 470 | |
| 170 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 49 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 16 to 18 | |
| 26 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 17 to 18 | |
| 32 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 14 | |
| 41 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 16 | |
| 12 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 77.9 to 90 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.22 to 0.28 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 2.0 to 4.0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 99.03 to 99.48 | |
| 0 to 1.3 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.050 to 0.55 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.3 to 0.6 | |
| 0 to 0.55 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.55 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.040 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
| 8.0 to 11 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 3.0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |