C16200 Copper vs. R04295 Alloy
C16200 copper belongs to the copper alloys classification, while R04295 alloy belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals. There are 18 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (12, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C16200 copper and the bottom bar is R04295 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 120 | |
| 100 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 56 | |
| 22 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.38 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 43 | |
| 37 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 240 to 550 | |
| 410 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 48 to 470 | |
| 300 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 210 | |
| 300 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 380 | |
| 260 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 7.2 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 9.0 | |
| 9.0 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 310 | |
| 950 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 10 to 99 | |
| 84 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 10 to 970 | |
| 430 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.2 | |
| 6.3 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 18 | |
| 17 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 7.4 to 17 | |
| 13 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 9.6 to 17 | |
| 14 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 8.7 to 20 | |
| 40 |
Alloy Composition
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0.7 to 1.2 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 98.6 to 99.3 | |
| 0 |
| Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 | |
| 9.0 to 11 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 0 | |
| 85.9 to 90.3 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.010 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.025 |
| Tantalum (Ta), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0.7 to 1.3 |
| Tungsten (W), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |