C92200 Bronze vs. 356.0 Aluminum
C92200 bronze belongs to the copper alloys classification, while 356.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (5, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C92200 bronze and the bottom bar is 356.0 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 70 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 25 | |
| 2.0 to 3.8 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 76 | |
| 55 to 75 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 41 | |
| 27 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 280 | |
| 160 to 240 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 140 | |
| 100 to 190 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 190 | |
| 500 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 170 | |
| 170 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 990 | |
| 620 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 830 | |
| 570 |
| Solidification (Pattern Maker's) Shrinkage, % | 1.6 | |
| 1.3 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 370 | |
| 900 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 70 | |
| 150 to 170 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 19 | |
| 21 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 14 | |
| 40 to 43 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 14 | |
| 140 to 150 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 32 | |
| 9.5 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.7 | |
| 2.6 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 3.2 | |
| 8.0 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 52 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 360 | |
| 1110 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 58 | |
| 3.2 to 8.2 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 87 | |
| 70 to 250 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 6.9 | |
| 15 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 18 | |
| 53 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 8.9 | |
| 17 to 26 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 11 | |
| 25 to 33 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 21 | |
| 64 to 71 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 9.9 | |
| 7.6 to 11 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 90.1 to 93.3 |
| Antimony (Sb), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 86 to 90 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 to 0.6 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 1.0 to 2.0 | |
| 0 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.2 to 0.45 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 1.5 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 6.5 to 7.5 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 5.5 to 6.5 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 3.0 to 5.0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |