K93050 Alloy vs. ASTM A369 Grade FP11
Both K93050 alloy and ASTM A369 grade FP11 are iron alloys. They have 63% of their average alloy composition in common. There are 19 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (13, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is K93050 alloy and the bottom bar is ASTM A369 grade FP11.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 190 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.3 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 72 | |
| 73 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 500 to 680 | |
| 470 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 270 | |
| 260 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1430 | |
| 1460 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1380 | |
| 1420 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 460 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 12 | |
| 13 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 26 | |
| 2.9 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.2 | |
| 7.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.7 | |
| 1.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 65 | |
| 21 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 120 | |
| 52 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 17 to 23 | |
| 17 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 17 to 21 | |
| 17 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 16 to 21 | |
| 14 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0.050 to 0.15 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 1.0 to 1.5 |
| Cobalt (Co), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 61.4 to 63.9 | |
| 96.1 to 97.7 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0.3 to 0.6 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 0.44 to 0.65 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 36 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 to 0.025 |
| Selenium (Se), % | 0.15 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0.5 to 1.0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 to 0.025 |