K94200 Alloy vs. Grade 18 Titanium
K94200 alloy belongs to the iron alloys classification, while grade 18 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 22 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (9, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is K94200 alloy and the bottom bar is grade 18 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 140 | |
110 |
Elongation at Break, % | 5.0 to 32 | |
11 to 17 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
0.32 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 54 | |
40 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 330 to 410 | |
420 to 590 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 500 to 710 | |
690 to 980 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 to 650 | |
540 to 810 |
Thermal Properties
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1440 | |
1590 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 500 | |
550 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 15 | |
8.3 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 5.0 | |
9.9 |
Electrical Properties
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.7 | |
1.3 |
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 3.0 | |
2.7 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 8.2 | |
4.5 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 35 to 130 | |
87 to 110 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 250 to 1460 | |
1380 to 3110 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.8 | |
13 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 21 | |
35 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 17 to 24 | |
43 to 61 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 17 to 22 | |
39 to 49 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 3.7 | |
3.4 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 49 to 70 | |
47 to 67 |