R04295 Alloy vs. C10400 Copper
R04295 alloy belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals classification, while C10400 copper belongs to the copper alloys. There are 18 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (13, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is R04295 alloy and the bottom bar is C10400 copper.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 100 | |
| 120 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 22 | |
| 2.3 to 50 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.38 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 37 | |
| 43 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 410 | |
| 230 to 410 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 300 | |
| 77 to 400 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 300 | |
| 210 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 260 | |
| 390 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 7.2 | |
| 17 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 9.0 | |
| 9.0 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 950 | |
| 340 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 84 | |
| 8.5 to 91 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 430 | |
| 25 to 690 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 6.3 | |
| 7.2 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 17 | |
| 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 7.2 to 13 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 14 | |
| 9.4 to 14 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 40 | |
| 8.2 to 15 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 99.9 to 99.973 |
| Hafnium (Hf), % | 9.0 to 11 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0015 | |
| 0 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 85.9 to 90.3 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 to 0.0010 |
| Silver (Ag), % | 0 | |
| 0.027 to 0.050 |
| Tantalum (Ta), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0.7 to 1.3 | |
| 0 |
| Tungsten (W), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 to 0.7 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |