R05240 Alloy vs. R04295 Alloy
Both R05240 alloy and R04295 alloy are otherwise unclassified metals. Both are furnished in the annealed condition. They have a modest 39% of their average alloy composition in common, which, by itself, doesn't mean much.
For each property being compared, the top bar is R05240 alloy and the bottom bar is R04295 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 150 | |
| 100 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 25 | |
| 22 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.36 | |
| 0.38 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 57 | |
| 37 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 270 | |
| 410 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 170 | |
| 300 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 210 | |
| 300 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 190 | |
| 260 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 6.8 | |
| 7.2 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 14 | |
| 9.0 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 460 | |
| 950 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 59 | |
| 84 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 90 | |
| 430 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 6.3 | |
| 6.3 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 13 | |
| 17 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 5.4 | |
| 13 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 6.8 | |
| 14 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 18 | |
| 40 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 | |
| 9.0 to 11 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0015 | |
| 0 to 0.0015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 35 to 42 | |
| 85.9 to 90.3 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 to 0.010 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 to 0.025 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0 |
| Tantalum (Ta), % | 57.9 to 65 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0.7 to 1.3 |
| Tungsten (W), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |