R60804 Alloy vs. R60802 Alloy
Both R60804 alloy and R60802 alloy are otherwise unclassified metals. Both are furnished in the annealed condition. Their average alloy composition is basically identical.
For each property being compared, the top bar is R60804 alloy and the bottom bar is R60802 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 98 | |
| 98 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 22 | |
| 22 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 36 | |
| 36 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 430 | |
| 430 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 | |
| 270 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 250 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
| 270 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 22 | |
| 22 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 6.0 | |
| 6.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.5 | |
| 6.5 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 290 | |
| 290 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 85 | |
| 85 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 380 | |
| 380 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.3 | |
| 8.3 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 23 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 18 | |
| 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 | |
| 19 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
| 12 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 53 | |
| 53 |
Alloy Composition
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0.070 to 0.13 | |
| 0.050 to 0.15 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0.18 to 0.24 | |
| 0.070 to 0.2 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0.030 to 0.080 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 1.2 to 1.7 | |
| 1.2 to 1.7 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 97.8 to 98.6 | |
| 97.8 to 98.7 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.11 |