356.0 Aluminum vs. AISI 410 Stainless Steel
356.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while AISI 410 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 32 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 356.0 aluminum and the bottom bar is AISI 410 stainless steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 55 to 75 | |
| 190 to 240 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 70 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 3.8 | |
| 16 to 22 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 55 to 75 | |
| 190 to 350 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.28 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 27 | |
| 76 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 140 to 190 | |
| 330 to 470 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 160 to 240 | |
| 520 to 770 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 100 to 190 | |
| 290 to 580 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 500 | |
| 270 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 170 | |
| 710 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 620 | |
| 1530 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 570 | |
| 1480 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 900 | |
| 480 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 150 to 170 | |
| 30 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 21 | |
| 11 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 40 to 43 | |
| 2.9 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 140 to 150 | |
| 3.3 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | |
| 7.0 |
| Calomel Potential, mV | -730 | |
| -150 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.6 | |
| 7.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.0 | |
| 1.9 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 27 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1110 | |
| 100 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 3.2 to 8.2 | |
| 97 to 110 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 70 to 250 | |
| 210 to 860 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 15 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 53 | |
| 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 17 to 26 | |
| 19 to 28 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 25 to 33 | |
| 19 to 24 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 64 to 71 | |
| 8.1 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 7.6 to 11 | |
| 18 to 26 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 90.1 to 93.3 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0.080 to 0.15 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 11.5 to 13.5 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.6 | |
| 83.5 to 88.4 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.2 to 0.45 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 to 1.0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.75 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.040 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 6.5 to 7.5 | |
| 0 to 1.0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |