ASTM A372 Grade H Steel vs. AWS E383
Both ASTM A372 grade H steel and AWS E383 are iron alloys. They have a modest 36% of their average alloy composition in common, which, by itself, doesn't mean much. There are 22 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (10, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ASTM A372 grade H steel and the bottom bar is AWS E383.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
210 |
Elongation at Break, % | 20 to 22 | |
34 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
0.28 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 73 | |
80 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 650 to 910 | |
580 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
320 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1460 | |
1420 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1420 | |
1370 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
470 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 45 | |
12 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
14 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Base Metal Price, % relative | 2.3 | |
37 |
Density, g/cm3 | 7.8 | |
8.1 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.5 | |
6.4 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 20 | |
89 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 49 | |
240 |
Common Calculations
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
14 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
24 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 to 32 | |
20 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 21 to 27 | |
19 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
3.1 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 19 to 27 | |
15 |
Alloy Composition
Carbon (C), % | 0.3 to 0.4 | |
0 to 0.030 |
Chromium (Cr), % | 0.4 to 0.65 | |
26.5 to 29 |
Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
0.6 to 1.5 |
Iron (Fe), % | 97.3 to 98.3 | |
28.8 to 39.2 |
Manganese (Mn), % | 0.75 to 1.1 | |
0.5 to 2.5 |
Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0.15 to 0.25 | |
3.2 to 4.2 |
Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
30 to 33 |
Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
0 to 0.020 |
Silicon (Si), % | 0.15 to 0.35 | |
0 to 0.9 |
Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
0 to 0.020 |