Grade 25 Titanium vs. C64200 Bronze
Grade 25 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while C64200 bronze belongs to the copper alloys. There are 28 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 25 titanium and the bottom bar is C64200 bronze.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
| 14 to 35 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 40 | |
| 42 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 600 | |
| 330 to 390 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 1000 | |
| 540 to 640 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 940 | |
| 230 to 320 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
| 250 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 340 | |
| 210 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1610 | |
| 1000 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1560 | |
| 980 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 560 | |
| 430 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 7.1 | |
| 45 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 9.6 | |
| 18 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 1.0 | |
| 8.0 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.0 | |
| 8.6 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 4.5 | |
| 8.3 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 43 | |
| 3.0 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 700 | |
| 50 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 320 | |
| 370 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 110 | |
| 73 to 170 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 4220 | |
| 240 to 470 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 7.5 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
| 19 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 62 | |
| 18 to 21 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 50 | |
| 18 to 20 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 2.8 | |
| 13 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 71 | |
| 20 to 23 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 5.5 to 6.8 | |
| 6.3 to 7.6 |
| Arsenic (As), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 88.2 to 92.2 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.013 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0.3 to 0.8 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Palladium (Pd), % | 0.040 to 0.080 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
| 1.5 to 2.2 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 86.7 to 90.6 | |
| 0 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 3.5 to 4.5 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |