Grade 25 Titanium vs. K93050 Alloy
Grade 25 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while K93050 alloy belongs to the iron alloys. There are 18 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (13, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 25 titanium and the bottom bar is K93050 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
190 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
0.3 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 40 | |
72 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 1000 | |
500 to 680 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
270 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1610 | |
1430 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1560 | |
1380 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 560 | |
460 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 9.6 | |
12 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 4.5 | |
8.2 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 43 | |
4.7 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 700 | |
65 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 320 | |
120 |
Common Calculations
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
13 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
23 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 62 | |
17 to 23 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 50 | |
17 to 21 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 71 | |
16 to 21 |
Alloy Composition
Aluminum (Al), % | 5.5 to 6.8 | |
0 |
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
0 to 0.15 |
Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.25 |
Cobalt (Co), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.5 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.013 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.4 | |
61.4 to 63.9 |
Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
0 to 1.0 |
Nickel (Ni), % | 0.3 to 0.8 | |
36 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
0 |
Palladium (Pd), % | 0.040 to 0.080 | |
0 |
Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.020 |
Selenium (Se), % | 0 | |
0.15 to 0.3 |
Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.35 |
Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
0 to 0.020 |
Titanium (Ti), % | 86.7 to 90.6 | |
0 |
Vanadium (V), % | 3.5 to 4.5 | |
0 |
Residuals, % | 0 to 0.4 | |
0 |