Grade 702C Zirconium vs. C81400 Copper
Grade 702C zirconium belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals classification, while C81400 copper belongs to the copper alloys. There are 21 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (9, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 702C zirconium and the bottom bar is C81400 copper.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 97 | |
120 |
Elongation at Break, % | 13 | |
11 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
0.34 |
Rockwell B Hardness | 84 | |
69 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 36 | |
41 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 430 | |
370 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 310 | |
250 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
210 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
390 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 22 | |
260 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 5.7 | |
17 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 6.7 | |
8.9 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 450 | |
310 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 52 | |
36 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 510 | |
260 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.1 | |
7.3 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
18 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 18 | |
11 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 | |
13 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
75 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 55 | |
13 |
Alloy Composition
Beryllium (Be), % | 0 | |
0.020 to 0.1 |
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
0 |
Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
0.6 to 1.0 |
Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
98.4 to 99.38 |
Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 to 4.5 | |
0 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
0 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
0 |
Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
0 |
Zirconium (Zr), % | 94.8 to 100 | |
0 |
Residuals, % | 0 | |
0 to 0.5 |