Grade 702C Zirconium vs. R60802 Alloy
Both grade 702C zirconium and R60802 alloy are otherwise unclassified metals. They have a very high 98% of their average alloy composition in common. There are 20 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 702C zirconium and the bottom bar is R60802 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 97 | |
98 |
Elongation at Break, % | 13 | |
22 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
0.34 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 36 | |
36 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 430 | |
430 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 310 | |
270 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
250 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
270 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 22 | |
22 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 5.7 | |
6.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Density, g/cm3 | 6.7 | |
6.5 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 450 | |
290 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 52 | |
85 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 510 | |
380 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.1 | |
8.3 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
23 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 18 | |
18 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 | |
19 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
12 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 55 | |
53 |
Alloy Composition
Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
0 |
Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
0.050 to 0.15 |
Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 to 4.5 | |
0 |
Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
0 |
Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
0.070 to 0.2 |
Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
0.030 to 0.080 |
Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
0 |
Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
0 |
Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
0 |
Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
1.2 to 1.7 |
Zirconium (Zr), % | 94.8 to 100 | |
97.8 to 98.7 |
Residuals, % | 0 | |
0 to 0.11 |